this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
141 points (94.3% liked)
Technology
86512 readers
3255 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They should join the web browser rebel alliance since there is no alternative to Chrome.
Ladybird is slowly becoming useable the last time i looked, so there is some movement out there, but it's slow and the future of the open web browser and the open web itself is currently very uncertain.
Ladybird's main dev considers existance of anybody who isn't he-him to be a political stance.
I am more interested in servo browser now.
Last year I was reading a bit about Mozilla, all that google money, their spendings, their CEO and got really really angry looking on how shit the Firefox is I use daily.
The reason Firefox still exists is that Google can prove it's not a Chrome monopoly. Now this is just me forming conspiracy theories, but I do believe that Google would stop these payments the day Firefox would really out-innovate Chrome and get more market share.
I do believe all that Google money is not keeping Firefox alive, it's keeping it dead.
At that moment I rage-donated money to Servo. Monthly. Didn't regret it, yet. Found their transparency records what they use it for. Up to now they use their money very responsibly.
I don't know about that. One of the big reasons chrome even got off the ground when it started was that it had the reach and backing of Google. If you opened Google, you had a "Get Chrome". If you did a search on Google, you had a "Get Chrome". You had advertisements, etc. It being faster to start with was nice, but even then, the other browsers at the time caught up pretty quickly.
Without that help, Firefox might just get left in the dust. We've already been at the point where websites are mainly designed for Chromium browsers, and that you're encouraged to fire it up if something doesn't work for you, and you're using Firefox, Safari, Konqueror, etc, since the majority of users use some form of Chrome.
Microsoft couldn't hack it when they tried developing their own browser, and they're both much larger than Mozilla, have the reach of Windows, and whatever was left over from IE. They ended up switching over to Blink/Chromium.
I can't imagine Mozilla would fare any better, after losing a decent chunk of their funding. The fact that they've done decently so far is a minor miracle in and of itself.