this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
424 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86563 readers
3126 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As in obvious. Like they have model instructions and bots credited as authors on commits.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Congrats you made a mistake. Any contributor can make commits with ai bots credited into them, and it's not displayed to the reviewer. Meaning that for just accepting a MR that looked good, you would get banned. Nothing is obvious

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The rule is for vibe coded projects. From the article:

If your work fits into these cases, it is unlikely that you are affected at all:

  • Projects who have an active community that cares about and maintains the software
  • Projects with a significant pre-LLM history
  • Maintainers who unknowingly or willingly accepted LLM-generated contributions from other contributors, if your project otherwise does not involve the heavy use of LLMs

They don't need a rule that can be run automatically because it's a purely human operation that is trying to take a stand against the more pernicious effects of corporate LLMs.

Do you just disagree with this stance and are just trying to poke whatever hypothetical holes you can in their logic, or do you just want more rigorous definitions/rules?

From experience, content moderation works best when there is some flexibility in the rules, so people can talk it out and come to concessions together.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 10 hours ago

Carighan talked about "mass-banning". This is what I opposed to

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody cares for your got'em logic, it just makes you look childish.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 15 hours ago

The child is the person who acts before thinking and without caring about the issues it will cause

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 0 points 22 hours ago

Why? That'd not he what a company banning the projects would do, so why should it be done beforehand?

It's exactly about having a hard cut-off, but for a softly defined offense.