Cybersecurity

10375 readers

244 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

kid@sh.itjust.works

Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social

Are NFC hardware tokens (Yubikey, NitroKey) less secure than USB-only ones? If so, how to mitigate? (thebrainbin.org)

submitted 1 day ago by modem_down@thebrainbin.org to c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Yubikey and NitroKey offer NFC and non-NFC versions of their flagship hardware security tokens (HSTs).

NFC is convenient, but can under some circumstances send e.g. challenge-response exchanges in clear text.

Smartcards using RFID, a similar though not identical protocol, can be queried from ~100cm away.

Are there other ways are NFC HSTs are known to be more risky than their non-NFC counterparts?
Should users store NFC HSTs in RFID-blocking pouches, like those used for wireless car keys or contactless bank cards?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The N in NFC is Near. For someone to exploit it they need to be within centimeters of your device. Even if you can do it at 1m, thats close enough that it can just be stolen from you.

Also, your link to rfidgate appears broken.

[–] modem_down@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if you can [exploit NFC] at 1m, thats close enough that it can just be stolen from you.

Stealing the HST should not give the user a false sense of security. Not so dangerous.

Silently exfiltrating the private key (or data for a replay attack), OTOH, would leave the user with a false sense of security. Dangerous.

your link to rfidgate appears broken

Wfm. Here's an archive link.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

The setup they have requires a pair of huge antennas, so pulling that off surreptitiously feels unlikely. They also had a controlled lab environment, so who knows how it would work in a less controlled RF space.

Definitely cool research, but this isnt a viable attack vector IMO.