this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
21 points (81.8% liked)

Technology

86847 readers
3353 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
21
How China gets better bang for its buck than America in AI. Its investment lags far behind America’s. Its models do not (www.economist.com)
submitted 11 hours ago by FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think of it like drafting behind another vehicle on the speedway. The car behind gets higher fuel efficiency

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But the problem there is that China is clearly ahead of America now when it comes to AI, so if that was it they wouldn't be getting higher fuel efficiency anymore.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

China is clearly ahead of America

Well that's debatable. The article implies that the US is still ahead. The root comment of this thread implies that the US is still ahead. Your earlier comment made no mention of this idea. Clearly if that was part of your argument you should have brought it up earlier

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The article implies that the US is still ahead.

The whole point of the article is that it's not (or at least not enough for the disparity we're seeing).

The root comment of this thread implies that the US is still ahead.

No, it implies it was ahead at one point (which is obviously true)

Its investment lags far behind America’s. Its models do not

Their models appear only fractionally less powerful owing to this frugality. K3, an advanced model launched last month by Moonshot AI, a Beijing-based startup, is 95% as clever (on widely used benchmarks) as Fable 5, a frontier model from Anthropic, another top American lab. It is also 70% cheaper to use. On August 3rd Alibaba, a Chinese tech giant, released a model which reportedly scored among the world’s best by some measures.

See also: Chinese models showing up at or near the top in leaderboards. Admittedly it seems I was wrong about China being clearly ahead, but what little gap exists is far from enough to explain the disparity in investment efficacy.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

little gap exists is far from enough to explain the disparity in investment efficacy.

This is difficult to say. From what I've seen AI gains are slowing down, so catching up might not be that hard anymore. We'll see from here if China is able to pull a clear lead. If so, then that's clear evidence that they aren't just copying