this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
1229 points (98.2% liked)
Enshittification
600 readers
4 users here now
Welcome to Enshittification
A community for everyone who misspelt it as enshitification.
"I the onceler felt sad as I watched them all go, but business is business and business must grow, regardless of crummies in tummies you know."
This is your space to document the decay, demise, and destruction of the tech world as we know it. Share stories, articles, and firsthand experiences that capture the ongoing decline of once-celebrated platforms, services, and companies in the late stage capitalist landscape.
From monopolistic corporate shifts to anti-user updates and the relentless pursuit of profit over quality—if it’s broken, bloated, or just plain bad, it belongs here. We’re here to spotlight the moves that make the tech world worse, one piece of enshittification at a time.
Guidelines
🔹 Stay on Topic: Only post content about the decline of tech products, platforms, or companies.
🔹 Quality Content: Give some context when posting links or articles to drive quality discussions.
🔹 Respectful Discussion: Critique companies, crappy tech, and capital, not community members.
🔹 Positive Monday: The first Monday of every month is reserved for positive content only that shows enshittification isn't inevitable.
Join us to expose the changes that ruin the things we once loved and to discuss what comes next in a tech world gone wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I guess my question would be: what creator wouldn't need direct funding from their fans?
That system of fan-to-creator patronage would cut out the parasitic marketer middle-men, starving them of ad placements and taking their ability to control the main creative hubs of the internet (through judgement of whether content is "ad friendly") away, empowering creators to create what they (or their fans, as has always been the case to some degree) want.
I am definitely making assumptions though. My Patreon/Kofi donations go to miniature painters, webcomic creators, video essayists, podcasters, and people discussing the sports I enjoy, rather than any huge companies or anything, so my experience with Patreon is very much biased in that direction.
I can understand that. As far as I usually hear from the bigger creators in their videos, at least on YouTube, they are still subject to "ad friendliness" guidelines in their work to enable them to get ad reads and for ad placements.
To me, that still means their work is being perverted and held hostage by marketers so they'd definitely benefit from direct funding from their fans, at least in terms of freedom of expression and authenticity in their work.
If we're talking about escaping the "enshittification" of the internet, we're talking at least in part about escaping advertising and tracking.
With that in mind, there wouldn't be $50,000USD ad read payouts; direct fan-to-creator patronage is (right now) and would be the best way to support creators you respect and appreciate.