This is why I am conflicted. I don't know where the line should be. I don't know if anyone does. But like many things in life it is a balancing act with pro's and con's on either side.

I know very well that cameras offent don't do much if anything. The place I work has had cars broken into the cop's looked at the video of it happening and them going yup it happened don't know who it is so can't really do shit.

I mainly look at my cameras as a notification system. Like I said I know what's happening on my property as it happens rather than after the fact. I also practice the 2nd amendment, now. ( a liberal with a gun what will happen next)

I'm guessing your in the US but if not ignore. The first amendment gives the right to record in public for news, everyone has the right to record and disseminate that info for the public. Would it be any different than someone with a photographic memory writing or drawing everything and disseminating that info to the public as news? The 4th amendment gives the right to be secured in your persons and things but if display it for me to see its not my duty to turn away, its yours to hide it. If you willing give the cops your info its your falt not theirs for violation of your 4th amendment right.

While uncomfortable, annoying and leads to people living in the basement with tinfoil over their windows, I would rather have the right to stand outside ice facilities, court houses, and public official houses on a public sidewalk, with a camera, protesting. Than deny any citizens a camera because someone was uncomfortable they where being filmed. Privacy in public isn't a right but filming in public is. ( so we can hold our government accountable for the things they do.)

Edit. I trust random Joe Blow with a camera more than any state.