this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
13 points (74.1% liked)

movies

3254 readers
347 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried to post the video here, it's only a few megabytes but Voyager (app) or the server refuses to accept it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but she’s a zionist weirdo, she’s done

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And just kinda a terrible actor to boot

[–] Steve@communick.news 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Please! She's not remotely terrible.
She totaly mediocre, midrange, or mostly adequate.

Go see The Room.
That'll recalibrate your concept of terrible acting.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I get your point, but she's pretty bad for a marquee name like Hollywood keeps trying to make us believe she is.

[–] Steve@communick.news 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

She is a name. She is popular.
But that's just because she's realy pretty.

Most of the best actors aren't realy the Big Stars anyway. The biggest stars are always mostly about their looks.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

What's your point here, youre literally agreeing with me. All I said was she's a bad actor. You're saying she's only in big movies because she's attractive, which i agree about.

I dont care if she's fuckin popular, she's bad at her job, which is to convincingly portray the lines she's given with emotional depth.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

I think the old stars were about skill. The new stars are sadly about looks.