this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
255 points (95.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3544 readers
197 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As long as it doesn't have a camera, no. But all of them do, so yes.
It's really annoying that they all have a camera. One, they don't need it. Two, it's murder on the battery life. Every time I've looked to see if they finally made smart glasses without a camera they haven't and the battery life for all of them is about four hours. Why the hell would I want something that I'm going to be using from when I wake up until I go to sleep only have the cool part I paid extra for work for four hours? I got a smart watch that runs for two days on a charge. If the watch can do it, glasses can do it.