Politics

1114 readers

13 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

129

A CDC panel has struck down universal newborn hepatitis B vaccination (www.sciencenews.org)

submitted 3 months ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The altered Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, without new data to justify a reassessment, will no longer recommend universal hepatitis B vaccination at birth. The committee voted 8–3 to limit vaccination of newborns to those whose mothers test positive for the virus.

For mothers who test negative during pregnancy, ACIP now recommends waiting until their infants are two months of age to give them the first dose. There was no evidence provided at the meeting to support this timing change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I went for a covid vax last week, and my provider required me to read this long statement about how covid vaccination is only recommended for people over 65 or people with specific health conditions. They made me 'attest' to understanding that the vaccine isnot* recommended for me, but that I was voluntarily requesting it.

Now, I know that's some lawyer bullshit. The practitioner agreed it was new corporate policy, but they were careful not to say anything that would have indicated a personal or professional belief other than the corporate legalese. And I'm pretty sure that some people, reading that a treatment is not recommended, will interpret that as actively discouraging rather than the absence of encouragement.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's some "giving insurance an excuse not to cover it" bullshit. Elective = self-pay.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I can't say for other insurers, but mine still gives covid shots to non-recommended groups with no out-of-pocket cost. Their epidemiologists and actuaries still know that preventative care is way more profitable than emergency care, even if the lawyers kowtow to policy. I imagine that birth-hepatitis vax will be similar, but everything about births seems to be a cash grab for them.