this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
961 points (98.7% liked)

Buy European

7830 readers
105 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] somewhiteguy@reddthat.com -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

A minimum of 2 fully fluorinated carbon atoms instead of 1 is NOT broadening the definition. Thatโ€™s narrowing it.

Think of the definition as a sluice gate. When you allow more things through, you're opening it wider, therefore broadening the definition. I know it's counter-intuitive sometimes to think of it like that. Narrowing the definition would be to let fewer things through, thus closing the gate.

Edit: Reading through the discourse below, I think I see the points made. It might should be reversed.

But wouldnโ€™t requireing two fluoridated carbon atoms instead of just one to qualify as PFAS, encompass less chemicals, thus narrowing the definition?

[โ€“] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Allowing more things through, if I understand your analogy correctly in this case, is broadening the exceptions -- things not matched by the definition.

But, I'll bite, let's dive in. In a Venn diagram, substances with a minimum of 2 fully fluorinated carbon atoms is a subset of substances with a minimum of 1fully fluorinated carbon atoms, yes? Similarly, M&Ms with only red and green colors is a subset of M&Ms of any color, yes? If a person was to change their personal definition of acceptable M&Ms from any color to only red and/or green, would you call that broadening that definition?

[โ€“] Limonene@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The EPA definition would exclude chemicals like trifluoroethanol, so the EPA's definition is narrower, not broader.

From a strict organic chemistry perspective, trifluoroethanol contains a perfluorinated methyl group, and methyl is a type of alkyl, therefore it must be considered a PerFluoro Alkyl Substance.