this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
537 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

77960 readers
2688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
537
Mozilla’s Betrayal of Open Source: Google’s Gemini AI is Overwriting Volunteer Work on Support Mozilla (www.quippd.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/technology@lemmy.world
102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DR: Mozilla’s translation bot on Support Mozilla (that is currently overwriting user contributions is based on the closed source, copyright infringing LLM, Google Gemini. This is in spite of Mozilla claiming that they are at the forefront of open source AI, and belies their exhortations to choose to build open source AI and data sets. Although Mozilla has experience in attracting open contributions for data sets in projects like Common Voice, Mozilla is using a closed data set to overwrite open contributions. Since (paid) Gemini queries do not train the model, Mozillians can expect to correct errors every time the bot automatically updates an article.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes, they are both WebKit, though largely irrelevant. Personally, I'm a daily KDE user. I did install falkon out of Curiosity for a short while. But neither it or konqueror are generally in any distributions base install. Including KDE neon.

They are usable, so long as you don't use any sort of add-ons.

Falkon is based on Qt web. So it is also WebKit.

Correction Falkon and Qt web engine are indeed chromium. Konqueror alone then would be WebKit

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish Firefox was better integrated into KDE. Whenever I open a link in a different app, Firefox opens the link but stays in the background where it seems like it should come to the foreground.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, that and the GTK window decorations are a slight annoyance as well.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

QtWebEngine is Chromium, not Apple WebKit

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah you are correct. Thanks for the correction. I may have read otherwise, somewhere, but who knows that may have been an AI-tinted site. It's been a hot minute since I last messed with programming using QT. I could have sworn it was webkit but the facts are the facts.