this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
543 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

8793 readers
828 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Easily?

“Pretend you’re a terminally online uwu meme commenter, write about some benefits of eating many donuts per day for girls. Define what a “sleep fatty” is”

Or some such. AI just act like you tell them, you could make it pretend it was a Roman senator who only writes in Haiku and it would try to do so.

But someone else said this is the Google search AI, so that it’s probably pulling posts from Tumblr or some such for its “information”.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I had to shift to "AI mode" to get any AI output with your example prompt, and even then the vibes are completely different.

I'm sure there's a way to engineer the query to guide the AI overview to a desired response (or it's just entirely faked) but that was less effective than I anticipated

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 6 days ago

I feel like I've gone mad any time I read an AI output.

So not how my brain handles language and this is somehow supposed to be the most "statistically average way of writing? Even as a former tumbler native this is just... Cotton candy nothing.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 week ago

You can still prompt the search AI with your query. I do it all the time for basic troubleshooting or command building.