technology

24142 readers

64 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

context@hexbear.net

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net

Wakmrow@hexbear.net

SwitchyandWitchy@hexbear.net

US Senate introduces bipartisan bills to repeal 'Section 230' of Telecommunications Act of 1996; repealing Section 230 could make Hexbear Admins and Moderators legally liable for posts made by Users (thehill.com)

submitted 1 week ago by dead@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) introduced the Sunset Section 230 Act, which would repeal the tech liability shield within two years.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shields companies from facing lawsuits over third-party user-generated content on their platforms.

It has become increasingly controversial in recent years, as Americans have sought to hold major tech firms accountable, particularly for online harms to children.

“Sunsetting Section 230 will force Big Tech to come to the table take ownership over the harms it has wrought,” Durbin said in a statement. “And if Big Tech doesn’t, this bill will open the courtroom to victims of its platforms. Parents have been begging Congress to step in, and it’s time we do so.”

Graham touted the “wide and deep bipartisan support” for their efforts.

They are joined on the bill by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Ashley Moody (R-Fla.) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.).

https://archive.is/OKg0p (senate gov - Senate Judiciary Committee press release)

https://archive.is/3xxTW (house gov - Congresswoman Harriet Hageman press release)

https://archive.is/2PnqH (senate gov - Senator Dick Durbin, Democrat Senate whip, press release)

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/6746 (Dick Durbin bill)

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/3546 (Harriet Hageman bill)

History of Section 230 by Wired Magazine

https://archive.is/gtJ8b

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] redsteel@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 week ago

I'm suspecting the same. This 230 thing, the massive surge in datacenter construction of the last few years, the memory and storage disruption which is just beginning and growing (and already expected to have bad long-term effects on all personal computing devices), the sweeping i.d. verification bullshit around the world and in many U.S. states now, the unilateral and unaccountable influence that demons like Thiel and Yarvin seem to have on politics.

It all feels like a complex, orchestrated push toward total individual surveillance and removal of personal (thus private) computing device ownership and open communications.