this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

TankieJerk

219 readers
137 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide or atrocity denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. Please redirect any Fediverse tankie-posts to !MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.works to avoid bringing drama to Piefed.social

Curious about non-tankie leftism? If you've got a little patience for 19th century academic style, let a little Marx and Kropotkin be your primer!

Marx's Communist Manifesto, short and accessible! Highly recommended if you haven't read it

Kropotkin's Conquest Of Bread

Selected works of Marx

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Arguably he was worse. His total kill count is probably higher

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Luckily, this isn't a competition and it's okay to hate all genocidal tyrants equally

[–] Xopher@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I mean, the numbers are just an indication of how much opportunity they had to massacre people.

It's not like there's a big ethical gap between someone who will kill 5 million and someone who'll kill 10 million. At that point, you'll just keep going until someone stops you.

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

Seems like there was a competition at the time though with how bad they all were!

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Stalin also had more time to do it and a larger country to do it with.

Hitler managed ~10 million by execution in ~5 years, and less directly caused another ~20 million in that same time period, with plans to continue it indefinitely if he won the war. Stalin would've had to murder the entire population of the USSR to match Hitler's rate of killing - not coincidentally, that was Hitler's long-term goal if he won.

Stalin was bad. Stalin was one of the worst human beings to ever disgrace this planet, and deserved a noose.

But Hitler was worse.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ultimately, Mao takes the cake anyway, as he managed to starve 15-55mln in just two years

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 week ago

The great somersault!