30

Either the work of Lenin, State and Revolution, or the actual topics themselves. I'm an ML and have come to understand why the dictatorship of the proletariat is necessary. But my anarchist comrades do not want that because of their authority issues. However, I have yet to see a convincing argument.

Basically, can anybody give me a resource for the anarchist perspective that debunks why, with still a class society, it's fine to do smash the state day 1 after the revolution? And how we would effectively prevent the state from reforming while still transforming culture and society away from class divisions (and all the problems emerging out of it)?

Not looking to debate this here but looking more for something to education myself better. I didn't go through anarchism, so there's a lot I'm likely ignorant of.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't bother. It's paragraphs of "Bakunin good, Engels poo-poo-head". The mountains of assertions it makes fail to justify the following:

Ultimately, Engels is simply confusing obedience with agreement, coercion with co-operation, organisation with authority, objective reality with despotism.

It's really not worth the read.

[-] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Bakunin good

what did he mean by this

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
30 points (85.7% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2159 readers
118 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS