this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
21 points (76.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8329 readers
375 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be pendantic, science doesn't give anybody facts. It can help identify provable lies and identify the most-useful theories, but when done correctly it cares only a little more about "fact" as it does "truth".

Basic fundamental theorems like "reality is real" are pretty entwined in our language, though, so the distinction isn't always a useful one.

By way of rambling example : my phone tells me that it's 12:30 now and 26 degrees F outside. You in reading this only know as a fact that it's what the text says. You don't strictly know:

  • That I actually wrote it
  • That I actually looked at my phone
  • That I faithfully reported it.
  • That I believe it to true
  • That the phone is an accurate report of the local weather station
  • That the weather station was calibrated correctly
  • What the expected variation between that station and my residence is.

For all practical purposes you can assume that they're all true and factual, though. But they're neither definitely true nor even scientifically useful facts.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree completely