this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
768 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

78124 readers
2620 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
768
We own the hardware, but not the experience anymore — Big Tech keeps building smarter, more connected devices, but the user experience feels more intrusive, more confusing, and less human (www.windowscentral.com)
submitted 2 days ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
154 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The line between helpful tech and quiet surveillance is blurring — and our devices no longer feel fully under our control.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The devices are locked down, sure, but there are strong incentives to upstream code and fund further development upstream. Linux ”won” because of this. You can’t build and develop Linux for such a wide audience and hardware flora with a bunch of hobbyists.

if these companies were upstreaming code, it would not be a problem to replace the factory operating system on their products with something else. however just like phone makers, they don't upstream the driver code needed for the onboard devices to work.

so far the only good I found to have come of it, is that after we find a vulnerability in their code, we can open a shell in the system and use ready made familiar tools to try to tame the devices from inside. until they force an update that patches the vuln because it got too popular, and you are locked out again.

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed, it’s not perfect, especially not with regards to drivers from some of them. But:

https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/korg/contributors?timeRange=past365days&start=2024-12-31&end=2025-12-31

I expect that the ability of B2C-products to keep their code somewhat closed keeps them from moving to other platforms, while simultaneously pumping money upstream to their suppliers, expecting them to contribute to development. The linked list is dominated by hardware vendors, cloud vendors and B2B-vendors.

Linux didn’t win on technical merit, it won on licensing flexibility. Devs and maintainers are very happy with GPL2. Does it suck if you own a Tivo? Yes. Don’t buy one. On the consumer side, we can do some voting with our wallets, and some B2C vendors are starting to notice.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Does it suck if you own a Tivo? Yes. Don’t buy one.

as I see there are no TV and only one or two smartphone makers that are not tivo, so saying that is equal to "don't buy home appliances, move into the woods"