this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
8 points (63.3% liked)

Death to NATO

1798 readers
3 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cui Bono? Even if the drones hit their tagret there was no way they were gonna kill Putin in one of the most fortified buildings outside the Kremlin.
As stupid and irrational as some of the ukrainian commanders are, is there really anyone who would think doing this attack while trump was meeting zelensky was going to help their cause? They all know that Trump is annoyed with ukraine more than he is annoyed with Russia. Someone with the stripes to organize a strike with 91 long range drones must have just a little bit more foresight than to think this would be a good idea. (There could be a deep cover Russian asset inside Ukraine who could organize this but that is a tiny bit too "007" for real life)
Russia isn't against playing dirty they are just way better at hiding it.

That the attack happened while zelensky was having a meeting with trump is a perfect way to spoil the "last person he talked to" effect on trump in fact it would likely cause an inversion of trump's mood toward zelensky. (a very "judo" style move of redirecting the opponent's momentum and using it against them.)
Putin was the guy to tell trump and I'm pretty sure trump trusts Putin more than he trusts most of the people in his own administration.

I can imagine Putin on the phone to trump, hamming it up, acting angry and irrational and saying he is going to kill zelensky. Putin would let trump talk him down which would work his ego. (imagine trump telling the story of how he saved zelensky's life and stopped a nuclear war in a single phone call)
Meanwhile Putin would extract concessions from trump "Ok I wont nuke keiv or shoot down zelensky's plane, but I have to do some big strikes or my people will think I'm going soft, you understand. Tell you what I just launch a couple Oresniks at some military targets. It'll be a big show but it won't be radioactive and it wont kill millions of civilians."

Its a way to get trump's understanding that Russia is going to do a K.O. strike and that it's the only way to get ukraine to accept the reality that the war is lost. Russia gets to do an attack that could spark a nuclear war under other circumstances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agree a lot with this. Just wanted to add here:

and leaving aside the question whether it’s really the military command making the decisions on things like this or if it’s the political leadership forcing them to do it, or maybe even the GRU acting independently, consider this:

It could also be orders from outside the country.

As for the overall idea of it being a false flag by Russia, I just don't see them doing anything differently with this that they couldn't have used any of a bunch of other different and unmistakably 'Ukrainian' attacks as a reason for it. I mean, they didn't even do much visible stuff against operation spiederweb, so I don't see this being a false flag and would be a little surprised if there were qualitative changes to how Russia is acting.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 months ago

As always blame the CIA