this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
64 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2395 readers
191 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

https://archive.is/20260109080655/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/09/grok-image-generator-outcry-sexualised-ai-imagery

In response to the outcry image generation is now turned off for non-paying users. Ostensibly it's so people who are not using Grok as god intended can be identified via their subscription information, but I can't help but think it's just Elon explicitly monetizing grok's CSAM capabilities.

Grok subscription tier Free Premium
CSAM Generation - ✔️
Revenge porn generation - ✔️
Create images of women shot and killed - ✔️
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 2 weeks ago

https://archive.is/20260109131721/https://www.theverge.com/news/859309/grok-undressing-limit-access-gaslighting

Turns out even the paywalling is fake since you can still do the edits by accessing grok from other parts of the interface like context menus, you just can't outright ask it in a tweet.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

heads up I heavily edited the post while you were responding though I don't think the essence changed. I added their reasoning for only allowing image generation for paying subs and expanded the table a bit.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 2 weeks ago

MechaEpstein is a distraction from the Epstein Files