571
submitted 11 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 66 points 11 months ago

Yes please, apply the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polluter_pays_principle

The absence of it's application means you make others pay for the costly decisions of a few, incentivizing and subsidizing damaging behaviour.

The absence also often means wealth transfer from poor to rich, as you need to have some wealth to be able to cause significant 'pollution'.

It makes so much sense. "You want this? Ok, then pay for what it entails, all the consequences." Only then people make informed decisions.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Dude, we are still stuck with half of America thinking more CO2 is good because it's "extra plant food". This policy you suggest would have them countering saying they should pay less for helping to feed the forests with their vehicle's emissions.

It's a great solution, but I don't know how we could get it passed.

[-] Lifebandit666@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

Great idea, I hear Aramco is the world's biggest polluter, let's start there.

[-] Llewellyn@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

You can start from several points in parallel.
There's no need to wait for Aramco.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
571 points (98.3% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS