New York Times gift articles

1608 readers

30 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Only post New York Times gift article links.

Info:

The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
“Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.

Tip:

Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

baltakatei@sopuli.xyz

Judge Allows Policy Restricting Lawmakers’ Access to ICE Facilities (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The decision permitted the Trump administration to continue restricting inspections of the conditions inside immigration detention compounds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What now Liberals? What's your praxis now?
CC @FiniteBanjo@feddit.online

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure what your point is, here. Trump has appointed hundreds of judges, none of which are liberal and a lot of whose rulings are blatantly unconstitutional. Many other judges were appointed by previous conservative administrations.

Sadly Cobb was a Biden nomination and I fully expect her to face harsh criticisms from both sides in the future.

Did you expect me to keel over and admit to... what even? We still have to fight the Trump admin and undo all of the harm, and the best way to do that is to promote the DNC and fight back against foreign interference from Russia and China.

[+] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Simple: are you going let the deathcamps continue to stand, or do something “unconstitutional”?

fight the Trump admin and undo all of the harm

How exactly again, if you're aware legally you have no backing?

best way to do that is to promote the DNC

⚡bzzt⚡ 🔗
🔗
🔗

fight back against foreign interference from Russia and China

this we🤝agree⭕

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if you're aware of this since you posted that chart, but that big line at the start is under the Bush Administration from 2001 to 2008, Obama was president from 2009 to 2016 where it was far in decline likely due to his policies of 72 hour holding limitations on immigrants without charges and an explicit Criminal-Only focus for the ICE, then Trump's first term was 2017 to 2020 where, again, there was a big spike in deaths and some migrants including young children were held for many months without charges and often deported to random countries alone and unsupervised, then from 2021 to 2024 was Biden where the 72 hour and the focus were put back in place you see it be the lowest it's ever been, and then after 2025 is Trump again with another huge spike.

DNC are the answer and they've had 48 or less senators for over 13 years. If we want change, we need to give them at least enough majority to reconsider the fillibuster rules, or otherwise a supermajority.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This "democrats did this thing back then", "voting doesn't matter", " do something unconstitutiobal" message is exactly what Russia is pumping around social media.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 month ago

“DNC allowed death encampment“ “Drone Strikes are necessary” “We are keeping Guantanamo Bay” “The tortures will contine.” all Democrat lines during Obama.

At what point is it enough?