this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
67 points (95.9% liked)

BuyFromEU

5691 readers
172 users here now

Welcome to BuyFromEU - A community dedicated to supporting European-made goods and services!

Feel free to post, comment and vote, be excellent to each other and follow the rules.

We also invite you to subscribe to:

Logo generated with mistral le chat Banner by Christian Lue on unsplash.com

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

See also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_(protocol)

It is similar to the old gopher: text files, links, and images form a hypertext optimized for reading. Text is formatted like Markdown - but even simpler.

Clients display text, like an eBook, or images / media.

Since it does not use "addictive by design" UI elements, like feeds, timelines, likes and upvotes, colorful and distracting elements, endless scrolling, as well as comments that invite trolling, it feels a lot calmer.

Servers can run on a PC or Raspberry Pi which needs half a Watt of power. No FAANG companies needed. No expert knowledge needed - not more difficult than running a file sharing client.

I think it is the right thing for defense of democracy and sharing your voice in the digital realm.

Edit: If you see comments here which kinda miss the point, appeal to emotions, have faulty logic, or depart from entirely incorrect assumptions: Please keep in mind that big US tech companies can't say "that's bad, how will we shovel money with this?". Please use your critical thinking skills - they are much needed here!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Libb@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

gemini is a very ideological project, and if you don’t buy in 100% it’s pretty hard to use. sticking to html is a better idea in my opinion.

I tried it but had to give up (a tad too technical for non-geek me), but I liked the idea a lot. That being said, I agree with you HTML (HTML and basic CSS) can achieve the same simplicity and lightness.

That's what I do for my blog (static, only HTML/CSS, no script, no nothing) and it works fine... within the usual web browser. I even occasionally post an image (very optimized, to reduce size and bandwidth usage, thx to the AVIF compressed file format)

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's what I do for my blog (static, only HTML/CSS, no script, no nothing) and it works fine... within the usual web browser.

Yeah but then you need a web server, complex config for it, security updates, and so on.

Gemini is far simpler and the reader has certainty that he/she is not served any advertising.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah but then you need a web server,

Don't you need one to host your Gemini files?

complex config for it,

Two questions:

  • What do you mean 'complex'? I have configured nothing on my web server, I just created a few folders. It's a static website, like a Gemini one would be, everything is done locally on my computer and only after that the static copy (HTML+CSS) is automatically copied to that host, making the static website accessible to the public. That's how all static websites work: they need no script, no configuration on the server. They're wonderful and I say that after decades dealing with WordPress on all my personal and pro websites ;)
  • How do you make your Gemini website? And how is it less complex than copying a bunch of HTML files from one's computer to one's web server?

security updates, and so on.

There is no security update to worry about with a static website (it's static, it can't run anything, there is no CMS, no script, nothing).

Gemini is far simpler and the reader has certainty that he/she is not served any advertising.

Far? You seem very willing to assert Gemini is simpler, I can hear you but don't forget repeating it doesn't demonstrate much.

For me, Gemini is a different and a very interesting take on static website publication, but it is still a static website generator and it certainly is not simpler.

At the very least because it requires a dedicated set of tools/software in order to make that website accessible to the public and another set of dedicated tools in order to access it.

On a much more personal level, take it for what it's worth it's merely my own personal experience: I consider it too complex for my level of 'expertise' as I failed to use Gemini properly (hosting it on the same web server I use to host my blog) whereas I have zero issue running a static HTML/CSS website on the same server. Note that it may also be I'm just too dumb to understand the magical simplicity of Gemini, I will happily grant you that possibility but at least I tried my best ;)

So, tell me how exactly is hosting a set of static Gemini pages is simpler than hosting a set of static HTML pages?

and the reader has certainty that he/she is not served any advertising.

How so?

Like I explain on my own blog: I decided to support all costs of running the blog and to not display any ads, For the same reason I run zero tracking, and zero script (I have no idea who if anyone is reading my posts) because I don't want to spy on my readers and because there is already way too much ads everywhere online and I wanted to remind people of what the Web used to be before its corporate/marketing take-over.

It's a choice. A choice anyone anyone is free to do, or to no do.

Note that if Gemini does not support visual ads and tracking (which Is great but not exclusive to Gemini) it doesn't prevent anyone to use textual advertisements or even to masquerade ads as standard content... One would obviously not get paid on clicks but there is always to get compensation. Like it’s too often the case in too many written press outlets: there is no click and no tracking on a print page, but advertisers do pay for putting ads in those.

edit: typos.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
  • what do you mean by "complex" ?

A gemini server only needs the folder with the public pages as configuration. Certificates are generated automatically.

  • How do you make your Gemini website? And how is it less complex than copying a bunch of HTML files from one's computer to one's web server?

Gemini uses a markup language which is simple - simpler than markdown (which is used on feddit).

It is described here:

https://gemini.flounder.online/docs/gemtext.gmi

It can be edited on the server with tools like midnight commander or WinSCP or notepad++. There exist a number of options how to edit these files on the server.

Or one writes it with a text editor and copies the files.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, I'd guess that 99% of WWW pages do advertising and tracking, and if you include personal pages on Facebook, Instagram and whatnot, it is probably over 99.99%. With Wikipedia and Arch Wiki as notable exceptions that comes to my mind.

In the meantime, exactly 0.0 % of gemini protocol pages do advertising and tracking. How come?

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, I’d guess that 99% of WWW pages do advertising and tracking, and if you include personal pages on Facebook, Instagram and whatnot, it is probably over 99.99%. With Wikipedia and Arch Wiki as notable exceptions that comes to my mind.

I'm not much into the guessing game. I'm also not a gambler.

In the meantime, exactly 0.0 % of gemini protocol pages do advertising and tracking. How come?

I'm more interested in encouraging people to transition toward more open and more accessible technologies than preaching them to 'adopt' a 'we-the-happy-few' technology for not other reason than me fancying it (you may have noticed I did not mention the tool I'm using to create my static website: the tool matters not. It should not.)

I'm glad to know you've found whatever it was you were looking for in using Gemini. Alas, you have not answered any of my questions. Your conviction is just a personal opinion, it is not information or facts I can use to reconsider my own choices, and it certainly doesn't give me any hint on why Gemini would be a better choice than the tool I've been using so far.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

accessible technologies

In respect to accessibility, the fact that Gemini focuses on actual text content makes it far easier to use accessibility tools like screen readers and Braille displays.

In fact, what is a real advantage is that there are also Genini clients which display in the terminal, and you can adjust the font size as you actually need. Myself I used that a lot when I had bad eye problems a while ago.