this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
89 points (98.9% liked)

Opensource

5493 readers
151 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's better to be aggressive and confrontational than to be slop.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And what about the people who use AI to help fix their English so that they're clear in what they're trying to say because English is their second or third language?

[–] gwildors_gill_slits@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

From the general guidelines section of the post:

"An exception will be made for LLM-assisted translations if you are having trouble accurately conveying your intent in English. Please explicitly note this ("I have translated this from MyLanguage with an LLM") and, if possible, post in your original language as well."

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Do what you want, but in that case I think it's even more important for language learners to learn from actual human speakers than to rely on AI as a crutch. You'll learn English faster if communicate authentically, mistakes and all.

If what you're communicating isn't clear, then people will let you know and ask you follow-up questions, giving you the opportunity to improve.

[–] JayGray91@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

They can read the output and edit in their own voice. ESL have been talking fine before LLMs got popular, they'll be fine now too.

I'm speaking as an ESL that busted my ass to teach myself speaking a whole lot better than native speakers that take it for granted.