this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
308 points (99.0% liked)

Fediverse

39597 readers
1424 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just thought I'd note this. Main beneficiary so far seems to be piefed.ca.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Saying some are doing amateur speculation is not the same thing as saying anyone who has issues are "amateurs".

[–] goferking0 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Except that is exactly how it reads.

ignore everyone else looking at the code because they're amateurs as we're the only professionals here

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's simply not how I read it at all. He's referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.

[–] goferking0 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn't review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.

Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I simply do not share this interpretation of his comments at all.

[–] goferking0 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I know, but you also can't see anything but positives from anything they do

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And I can say the reverse to you. You interpret every decision made in the worst possible light.

[–] goferking0 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Because I'm a cynical pet and keep seeing odd decisions made along with language that 80% of the time points to bad things.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Having actually interacted with rimu more than you, I think it's reasonable I simply dismiss your position here.

[–] goferking0 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Which again doesn't change how others would perceive the language used.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Are you purely upset about the use of "amateur" here?

[–] goferking0 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No it's their stance anyone reading the code has to talk with rimu or there's no way the person can understand it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Its more one can ask and inquire here if they wish rather than snipe and spam it around the fediverse everywhere.

[–] goferking0 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Again it's behave as I want and you have to talk to me or it's bad.

Am I talking to rimu now? Or just pr team?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

"Behave as I want"? What? I think it's reasonable for a developer, any developer to not view those who, from their perspective, seek to denigrate their work, possibly in bad faith, across multiple places.

You are talking to Skavau.

[–] goferking0 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So you do/can see the hostility from the language used. So piefed pr

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

No, I'm seeing hostility used from others across the wider fediverse. I don't think anything he said there was really specifically hostile at all in any thread. A complete reach.