this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
1047 points (99.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

37580 readers
3481 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 123 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)
  1. no one is hiring someone solely based upon your experience of working at any of those locations ... Ever.

  2. Nearly every HR (realistically any job that earns over 65k a year) have systems like TheWorkNumber, ADP, Credit Bureaus to get your employment records.

  3. If you done fucked up, they can request tax records and I can guarantee you that all those businesses you listed very much have their tax records available from the IRS.

  4. This idea worked like 10 years ago... Even shitty HR have figured this out by now.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

WTF that's way to much insights in data that shouldn't be collected in first place.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

And guess what! For $8 you can access all that data for anyone you want!

Fuck us plebs amirite?

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When i got hired last which was 2 years ago (in the US, huge company) they outsourced the checks to a 3rd party and my god were they incompetent. They passed me with a caveat saying they couldn’t confirm my most previous job. The records they turned over to me after show their attempts: 3 phone calls to the main number listed on the company’s website. That’s it. The process dragged on for so long i suspected they were having issues because most everyone i had worked with had been laid off and the company barely existed with likes 15 employees down from 300. They wouldn’t take my offer to connect to the VP and just called the same number until they gave up. Its laughable.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I disagree. Countless companies won't check this. Sure, Google or Amazon will... But you underestimate the collective incompetence of businesses in the US.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, no one is hiring me one way or the other, but with that method I can look at my CV and feel I accomplished something. So, that's good.

[–] mr_noxx@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're assuming that the HR department is diligent and willing to expend the energy to track you, and the other three hundred candidates' information down for this single role. In my experience, this is a wild assumption.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would imagine it's nowadays at the point where employment verification is automatically fired off to some vetting agency automatically during the process where software does all the cross referencing and anomalies would be caught and reported.

I don't think they have to go all private investigator to get basic employment verification from the actual employers anymore.

[–] mr_noxx@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

It really depends on the company you're applying to. If it's a small business? Yeah, no. They usually can't afford or don't want to bother with a vetting agency. If it's some big corporation? Sure, they'll probably do that. At the end of the day though, it's a question of how suspicious you or your resume look that will decide how much energy they want to put in to vetting the claims you make.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes and no. Up to 2 years ago my company was still manually requesting criminal background checks. A 3rd party company did them, but HR had to open a case each time. Now that is automatic, but tons of processss at tons of companies are still antiquated for various reasons.

Its entirely possible vetting is minimium because of cost and labor involved.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, but what if you live in a non English speaking country?