this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
629 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

80912 readers
4076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
629
Discord to Require ID or Face Scan Next Month for Full Access (discord.com)
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Discord Alternatives

  • Lobste.rs;
  • Tildes.

    • Beginning with a phased global rollout to new and existing users in early March, users may be required to engage in an age-verification process to change certain settings or access sensitive content. This includes age-restricted channels, servers, or commands and select message requests.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] Aatube@thriv.social -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

    https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500005292701-How-to-Access-an-Age-Restricted-Server-FAQ clarifies that Discord would only do that for servers that otherwise violate the Community Guidelines's provisions on adult content, whose only mention of which I quoted above.

    [โ€“] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 hours ago

    That doesn't look like clarification to me. It explicitly mentions sexual content then gives a vague "age-restricted themes" and "18+ content" that they can apply arbitrarily like YouTube did with "Hind's Hall"