this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
131 points (98.5% liked)

news

619 readers
737 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You ok? Do you know where you are right now?

You've inserted yourself in a thread defending one particular side (in this case, your adopted position is "No but you seem to be if you have to pull out a gun instead of fighting me with your bare hands.")

The argument against is "actually being 79 and crippled, the court may consider that in a self defense case and as long as the septuagenarian in a chair follows all the other laws involved with self defense (not that he did in this case), that ain't the dunk you think it is."

Now that you're caught up, why should almost 80yr old people in electric scooters fist fight younger stronger more able bodied and unknown sill level guys instead of taking their age and situation into account? What benefit do they get? "Sure he got beat to death because his loose ass old guy skin rips open if he steps wrong but at least nobody called him a pussy?" Great lol, sure convinced me, but the court still actually cares about the totality of circumstances, so, congrats I guess.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you aren’t considering all the factors at play

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

Hey, that's my line!

Look, this doesn't seem to be going anywhere, thanks anyway but have a nice one.