this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
249 points (69.3% liked)

/0 Governance

355 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahoy mateys!

A few of our users have recently pointed out that a lot of the pro-Zionist accounts on the fediverse nowadays seem to come from the feddit.org instance.

Feddit.org's explanation for this situation seems to fit into a few common variations:

  • They accept both pro- and anti-Zionist members, so it's not proof of a bias.
  • They [choose to] comply [in advance] with strict German / Swiss / Austrian laws regarding [overly broad] "antisemitic" language, or they might get in trouble.
  • Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu's genocidal fascist regime. Because [bad faith] reasons.
  • Lots of Euros (and Germans specifically) are pro-Zionist, so they feel like they have to accommodate this view.

But whatever the excuse happens to be, they need to do better imo. Israel is currently the most violent, fascist and genocidal nation state in the Middle East (if you exclude the US military bases there). And yet feddit.org seems to regard the Palestinians fighting against Israel's ongoing illegal occupation of their land as the real terrorists. As such, I am calling for feddit.org to:

  • Explicitly prohibit pro-Zionist accounts from joining.
  • Take measures to resolve their claimed legal issues, e.g., moving their server location to a less regulated jurisdiction, and ensuring that admin accounts remain anonymous regarding their location.
  • Stop referring to folks who call for "Death to Israel" or similar as though they are the terrorists or violent extremists. The Zionist Israeli settlers, the murderous IDF rapists, and the entirety of the Israeli government are clearly the violent ethnostate extremists we should be worried about, not the Palestinians in Gaza who are fighting for their lives every single day against completely disproportionate levels of Zionist violence.

More context

Our instance already voted to ban pro-Zionist accounts (see https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/60585441 for reference) and the rule that was implemented is here: Golden Rule #8.

As further context, you can find relevant comments and discussion in this post by a banned feddit admin in MoG (that fact they chose to post in MoG is in itself quite telling), and this post about their defederation from quokk.au over anti-semitism allegations has recently become active again.

I've also pulled out some choice morsels from the modlog to illustrate the sort of thing we are talking about:

This one says it all... mrdown@lemmy.world being banned for calling out feddit.org users for being Zionist apologists. It's apparently "xenophobic" to state a few hard truths.

If you have had similar experiences on feddit.org, please feel free to share in the comments.

Voting instructions

I am proposing to ban the following communities from feddit.org, which seem to be the most problematic communities in terms of hosting pro-Zionist posts/comments:

Upvote this post if you want dbzer0 / anarchist nexus to ban these communities.

Downvote this post if you'd prefer not to ban these communities.

Note 1: Votes from external instances do not count, unless one of our admins has vouched for you.

Note 2: If you think feddit.org deserves a full instance ban instead, or have alternative suggestions, then please leave your comments below. If enough people think that's the better option, then we'll do that instead.

Note 3: Although I don't really expect this to happen, if feddit.org agrees to make policy changes to address these issues then we are willing to reassess the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ok, this does not say anything against that site because I clicked away immediately after, but seriously? Althusser? The guy who killed his wife and then justified it by going on a long freudian rant about how his mother raped him by telling him he was a man? That Althusser? There is noone else that had similar ideas they could pick?

[–] Edie@hexbear.net 4 points 4 weeks ago

It's a very understandable reaction you had, but it's not actually a book by Althusser, rather it is a book by Steven Smith criticizing Althusser, as can be seen in the linked twitter:

Critcizing Althusser's Marxism can be tricky due to his virtues.

Steven Smith walks us through various issues in Althusser's account, exploring links to Spinoza, Kant, Heidegger, Foucault… and anti-humanism's nihilistic consequences.

The website has a lot of other interesting articles do check them out!


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Dirt_Possum@hexbear.net 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you visit redsails.org, the topmost post/entry is "Reading Althusser: The Structural Science of History (1984)." The user who responded to you has some justifiable problems with that author, so when seeing that was right at the top, they clicked away. I would say that's unfortunate because there is some exceptionally good stuff on redsails and that one entry (which I haven't read and may even share the user's feelings about Althusser) doesn't really have much to do with the site as a whole, but it does explain their reasoning for just clicking away from it.

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 weeks ago

no I mean it was a sort of instant reaction, the site does look cool and I will check it out later. It just took me by surprise

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

Before me: Hélène lying on her back, also wearing a dressing gown. ... Kneeling beside her, leaning over her body, I am engaged in massaging her neck. ... I press my two thumbs into the hollow of flesh that borders the top of the sternum, and, applying force, I slowly reach, one thumb toward the right, one thumb toward the left at an angle, the firmer area below the ears. ... Hélène's face is immobile and serene, her open eyes are fixed on the ceiling. And suddenly I am struck with terror: her eyes are interminably fixed, and above all here is the tip of her tongue lying, unusually and peacefully, between her teeth and her lips. I had certainly seen corpses before, but I had never seen the face of a strangled woman in my life. And yet I know that this is a strangled woman. What is happening? I stand up and scream: I've strangled Hélène!

— Althusser, L'avenir dure longtemps

(check out the odium symposium episode about it if you're curious)