this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
243 points (71.6% liked)

/0 Governance

342 readers
239 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahoy mateys!

A few of our users have recently pointed out that a lot of the pro-Zionist accounts on the fediverse nowadays seem to come from the feddit.org instance.

Feddit.org's explanation for this situation seems to fit into a few common variations:

  • They accept both pro- and anti-Zionist members, so it's not proof of a bias.
  • They [choose to] comply [in advance] with strict German / Swiss / Austrian laws regarding [overly broad] "antisemitic" language, or they might get in trouble.
  • Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu's genocidal fascist regime. Because [bad faith] reasons.
  • Lots of Euros (and Germans specifically) are pro-Zionist, so they feel like they have to accommodate this view.

But whatever the excuse happens to be, they need to do better imo. Israel is currently the most violent, fascist and genocidal nation state in the Middle East (if you exclude the US military bases there). And yet feddit.org seems to regard the Palestinians fighting against Israel's ongoing illegal occupation of their land as the real terrorists. As such, I am calling for feddit.org to:

  • Explicitly prohibit pro-Zionist accounts from joining.
  • Take measures to resolve their claimed legal issues, e.g., moving their server location to a less regulated jurisdiction, and ensuring that admin accounts remain anonymous regarding their location.
  • Stop referring to folks who call for "Death to Israel" or similar as though they are the terrorists or violent extremists. The Zionist Israeli settlers, the murderous IDF rapists, and the entirety of the Israeli government are clearly the violent ethnostate extremists we should be worried about, not the Palestinians in Gaza who are fighting for their lives every single day against completely disproportionate levels of Zionist violence.

More context

Our instance already voted to ban pro-Zionist accounts (see https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/60585441 for reference) and the rule that was implemented is here: Golden Rule #8.

As further context, you can find relevant comments and discussion in this post by a banned feddit admin in MoG (that fact they chose to post in MoG is in itself quite telling), and this post about their defederation from quokk.au over anti-semitism allegations has recently become active again.

I've also pulled out some choice morsels from the modlog to illustrate the sort of thing we are talking about:

This one says it all... mrdown@lemmy.world being banned for calling out feddit.org users for being Zionist apologists. It's apparently "xenophobic" to state a few hard truths.

If you have had similar experiences on feddit.org, please feel free to share in the comments.

Voting instructions

I am proposing to ban the following communities from feddit.org, which seem to be the most problematic communities in terms of hosting pro-Zionist posts/comments:

Upvote this post if you want dbzer0 / anarchist nexus to ban these communities.

Downvote this post if you'd prefer not to ban these communities.

Note 1: Votes from external instances do not count, unless one of our admins has vouched for you.

Note 2: If you think feddit.org deserves a full instance ban instead, or have alternative suggestions, then please leave your comments below. If enough people think that's the better option, then we'll do that instead.

Note 3: Although I don't really expect this to happen, if feddit.org agrees to make policy changes to address these issues then we are willing to reassess the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hupf@feddit.org -5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The three wise monkeys are doing Sippenhaft now?

Great, let's not have any pluralism on a federated discussion platform. Way to make a stand for a world of peace and mutual understanding.

Maybe if we build a big wall around people we don't like, it sure went well the other times in the last 70 years.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, right. We should debate Zionazis and their apologists on the marketplace of ideas! It will surely change their minds and not just give them a platform to spew their genocide apologea on... /s

[–] Hupf@feddit.org -3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, because people as well as opinions are purely binary. Luckily it's very easy to identify these communists lest we'd have to have them wear some clearly visibly symbol next to their username.

Boy I love me some bad faith online discussion to start the day.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Great example of the post topic here.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Is it though? Which incidence of Zionism was I active in or apologetic of, specifically? Or is it just that I'm coming off as otherwise disagreeable?

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 10 points 17 hours ago

talks about sippenhaft
wow ok why am I getting a cranky reply, you're just a bad faith troll

Maybe if we build a big wall around people we don’t like, it sure went well the other times in the last 70 years.

You're talking about Gaza right?