this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
136 points (95.3% liked)

Europe

6457 readers
20 users here now

Europe

Rules:

  1. All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
  2. Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lower courts reasoning sounds extremely solid to me. The upper court is inserting Zionist nonsense as rulings for the lower courts.

the grounds for the judgment must indicate the field of expertise of the expert consulted

So what they mean is that they need to ask Zionist "antisemitism experts" about it which will then say everything is Khamass.