this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
665 points (90.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

2056 readers
1639 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People are OK with auth right. But auth left? Oh no, that's not gonna happen. The military would coup the shit out of that real quick.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Auth Left is still inherently abusive.

No matter how much you pretend that it's for the greater good, authoritarianism will always be detrimental to the relatively powerless masses.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I'm not pretending anything. Just saying that auth left would never get as far as Trump is getting.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

auth left would never get as far as Trump is getting.

History would very much disagree with you.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not talking about history. Talking about what would happen today.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago

And I'm pointing out that history repeats itself when you don't learn from it.

Just like the fascists of today are fucking shit up like the ones in 1920s-40s Europe, the auth left extremists would fuck shit up like the likes of Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot.

The horseshoe theory shitlibs trot out to defame the left may be bullshit (definitely is), but auth left oppresses people because it's auth.

You just don't get good things from a select group excessively controlling everybody, no matter which group that is and how good their initial intentions are.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Using authority against billionaires is good actually

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's not like auth left stops there.

You can have egalitarian taxation and common sense regulations without being generally authoritarian, and you should.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago

So we’re to show no authority against billionaires and their enforcers (police) and validators (law workers/politicians) because it might go too far? Slippery slope claims tend to just reinforce the status quo since it stops people from doing anything functional. The status quo is definitively authoritarian.

Not saying that it has to, but is there an example of “without being generally authoritarian” out there in the wild somewhere? Because imo every country on earth uses authority to uphold some class structure and my country, even if we had all the things we wanted to make us happier (affordable housing, free medical care and education, public transit, etc) it would still show authority over the global south to maintain itself.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

“People” or Russian bots?