this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
234 points (99.2% liked)

Privacy

46157 readers
1216 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta, the parent company for Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, plans to introduce new face scanning tech while people are distracted by current political turbulence. The Trump-adjacent corporation plans to package the feature in new smart glasses. An internal Meta document seen by the New York Times (NYT) says:

We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.

The media outlet provides further info on what the tech would allow:

The feature, internally called “Name Tag,” would let wearers of smart glasses identify people and get information about them via Meta’s artificial intelligence assistant.

The cynical internal memo likely references the tumult currently sweeping the US amidst the mass criminality carried out by the brownshirts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Trump’s personal paramilitary goons have been violating laws left and right as they beat and kill their way around the US, under the pretext of an immigration crackdown.

ICE have already made extensive use of face scanning tech. Meta’s glasses would represent another privacy violating move, capturing massive amounts of personal data which may ultimately find its way into the hands of an authoritarian state. Meta has form when it comes to handing over info about customers to governments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@lemmy.today 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shit, so anyone wearing these glasses is compromising everyone they come into contact with, not just to data brokers, but by extension to the us government, and everyone else the data brokers sell the information to.

This is something the federal government actually should be regulating under interstate commerce, companies grabbing personal information of groups that didn't consent is hardly fair, not the least when the information is being used commercially and to the detriment of people.

I guess that is why previous google glasses wearers were accosted and chased out of establishments, they didn't want a corporate spy sending everyone's likeness to headquarters and data banks.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This is something the federal government actually should be regulating under interstate commerce

They should. Instead they're not only not doing that, but they're writing executive orders that make it illegal for states to do exactly that.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not only that, when the bubble pops, which it seems like it's going to as they've no way to make back the money they are investing, the federal government will bail them out I fear, and make them even more beholden to our politicians and their pet projects.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Man I sure hope the gov sees the writing on the wall and just lets it die. There's no "bailing out" a company that has no path to profitability. At least the auto and housing industries existed for hundreds of years prior.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 22 hours ago

Yeah think about it, they would hardly lose any jobs, the only people that will lose out will be investors, bond holders, corporations that signed contracts with them maybe. They would have to play on the few lost jobs it could cause, even those though, the chip makers will still have work, they will just have to switch back to making chips for computers, which we need to be cheaper as AI has led to a derth of computer chips and I presume skyrocketing prices. So the chip makers will be fine.

They really don't have an argument that I can see to bail them out, they will anyway, but it will be even more corrupt and blatant than what came before.

But maybe they can keep it going for a long time, especially with the fed about to be controlled by the executive and zero interest rates indefinitely. I mean look at Tesla, the actual value means nothing, apparently. It seems like it has to pop eventually, but I think the knowledge that the goverrnment will bail them out has led to less volatility as investors aren't so quick to jump ship.

Privatized gains, and socialized losses. The president is basically a communist. That is what I'm going with.