this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
321 points (97.6% liked)

Flippanarchy

2084 readers
340 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goldyLocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 was signed because people, left to their own devices, self-destructively pollute their water supplies. That law mandated people couldnt dump shit in the water. It also was passed because state laws weren’t effective at stopping people from polluting the water

It’s interesting that you quietly swap in “people” where history mostly shows industrial corporations dumping waste for profit.

Working class communities were not the ones lobbying to pour chemical sludge into rivers.

Most of the legislation you listed was not the state heroically saving humanity from itself. It was the state reacting to industrial capital externalizing costs onto the public. Central authority stepped in because private ownership plus profit incentives produced pollution at scale.

You’re treating absence of centralized state authority as if it means absence of rules, standards or coordination. That is not what anarchism argues. It argues against concentrated political authority. It does not argue against collectively enforced norms.

You cite centuries of people “fucking up.” A lot of that history is profit driven extraction protected by law, not spontaneous communal self destruction.

If anything, your examples show that concentrated power and profit incentives required constant correction. That is not a great defense of hierarchy.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It’s interesting that you quietly swap in “people” where history mostly shows industrial corporations dumping waste for profit.

I didnt realize corporations were sentient entities capable of acting on their own, rather than groups of people doing people things…

The 1899 act was legitimately created because everyday people were literally throwing their garbage into water as a form of waste management. So much so that it was difficult to navigate boats safely, ergo “Rivers and Harbors Act” as in the places that were affected by floating masses of garbage

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

There are HIERARCHIES that coerce people within them to put profit above all else or they lose their position in the hierarchy. I can't tell if you are a troll or just genuinely haven't put any thought into this at all.

[–] goldyLocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 21 hours ago

I didnt realize corporations were sentient entities capable of acting on their own, rather than groups of people doing people things…

I didn’t realize it takes rocket science to understand the difference between individual behavior and institutional incentives.