this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
82 points (97.7% liked)
Asklemmy
53596 readers
1081 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You've got it backwards. Rich countries have the infrastructure for networked solutions.
Developing countries don't have reliable fast internet or reliable power to rely so heavily on cloud services.
Better yet, it's gonna be an opportunity for western infrastructure companies to enslave, yet again, the underdeveloped with predatory infrastructure loans like they did back in post-WW2.
I think most poor countries today are more likely to offer an internet connection that can bearably support cloud services than they are to offer their working people with a good enough income to be able to afford the future price of personal computers.
It's also to the benefit of their capitalist class to develop internet infrastructure so that's another motive to actually do it