347
The DOJ Quietly Deleted 892 Epstein Documents. We Built a System to Prove It.
(epsteinexposed.com)
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
347 points (99.7% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1131 readers
49 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thanks for the shoutout, it means a lot. This is a subject near and dear to me. Always happy to help. I didn't expect you to remove it because it did not specifically break any rules, but. . . it is what it is.
And as long as I have your attention, keep an eye on what comes out of lemmy. org: almost immediately after that list of lemmy. org users I linked to above (all created on the same day, btw) got exposed as participants in vote manipulation, lemmy. org stopped federating vote information, maybe even the same day. So now whenever you try to use lemvotes.org to get info on any comment, post, or user made through lemmy. org it 404's out unless it's historical and prior to that defederation of vote info.
There's one lone admin over there, and he seems to have a side business in "Display & Video Monetization Solutions" which, nothing against that when it's aboveboard, but artificial hype is very much a part of that game in general.
So to me, given all this info taken together, when something comes across the comm that's fishy, also coming from lemmy. org is a solid strike against. It's not a crime in itself, of course, just something for you to be aware of when evaluating a questionable post or comment.
Noted