this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
204 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

81649 readers
6907 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
204
Colorado proposing Bill to move age verification to Operating System rather than web site (www.biometricupdate.com)
submitted 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Senate Bill 26-051 reflects that pattern. The bill does not directly regulate individual websites that publish adult or otherwise restricted content. Instead, it shifts responsibility to operating system providers and app distribution infrastructure.

Under the bill, an operating system provider would be required to collect a user’s date of birth or age information when an account is established. The provider would then generate an age bracket signal and make that signal available to developers through an application programming interface when an app is downloaded or accessed through a covered application store.

App developers, in turn, would be required to request and use that age bracket signal.

Rather than mandating that every website perform its own age verification check, the bill attempts to embed age attestation within the operating system account layer and have that classification flow through app store ecosystems.

The measure represents the latest iteration in a series of Colorado efforts that have struggled to balance child safety, privacy, feasibility and constitutional limits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

And I will tell you this: the operating system is 100% where you want to do age verification.

Oh, what's that you're using? It's Linux? Sure that's fine, just make sure the age verification check works on it.

Wait, what do you mean you have "root access"? Why do you keep repeating "it's my hardware and I own it"? You removed the age check system? You can do that! Hey, he's not supposed to be able to do that!

Colorado proposes bill to ban open source operating systems

As a parent, systems and web developer of both open source and proprietary software. This would single-handedly be one of the most damaging things to ever happen to the world of personal computing.

From a technical point of view, having OS-level verification is the least worst, and in my technical opinion, the best option.

It's a horribly bad opinion. It's the same old problem with client-side anti-chest. You can't trust the hardware. If the user has full access to the computer, then they can do whatever they want with it. This is a core issue in security modelling. So what's the answer? Try to lock down the system. This is why anti-cheat software, to play a video game, has more access to your computer's hardware than you do as a user. Full access to every single file, data in memory, webcams, things on screen, etc.

What's going to happen if it becomes mandated that age checks must happen in the OS? We're going to get computers so locked down that you won't be able to open a .txt file without some kind of authentication check.

No thanks. I'm happy to avoid every single age-check required service.