this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
1209 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81863 readers
5034 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ruxias@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Are you here for discussion or just to make quips?

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago
[–] Lvdwsn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly the latter. Don’t let this sour guy dampen your willingness to engage meaningfully on this platform!

[–] Ruxias@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I won't let it get to me. I insist on trying to get people to question themselves and the world around them.

And to the point of the insult: I'm not on a high horse, as there is no perfectly ethical consumption under our current situation. I give money to companies who I can't say are operating ethically. But we need to approach that and discuss that to develop our consciousness as a class. The "it was a good deal and I'm completely removed from it" is a thought-terminating sentiment that barricades us from developing our understanding of the world around us.

To their credit: there are a lot of people insulting them. Their brain views this entire thread as adversarial now. I forgive them, as they are me and I am you. Solidarity always.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

Damn, that horse just keeps getting taller....