this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)

NASA

1483 readers
2 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm conflicted on it. I think if Starliner or Dragon had those heat shield problems, there would absolutely be another test flight to check the fixes. It's also surprising that the ECLSS didn't fly on Artemis 1, but at least they'll have the checkout time in Earth orbit for that. Northrop's issues with Vulcan SRBs lately also don't help.

On the other hand, if the astronaut test pilots understand the risks (way more than me) and still want to go, why would us armchair engineers tell them no?