this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
1107 points (89.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38242 readers
4405 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s just American, Israeli and other (extreme) right wing media. So it’s not “western media”.

And no, bombs on an actual terrorist’s head are good bombs. A bomb on Hitler’s ass (like the attempted “Valkyrie” bombing) would have been a damn near perfect bomb.

And as for the Israeli bombs – and as I told the other guy – try to read what I actually said and not what you expect to read based on your prejudices.

[–] Peehole@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes some NATO bombs are necessary but many are also bad, some Israeli bombs may have been necessary in the past but are now overwhelmingly bad.

That’s what you said and that’s why I responded to.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And where did it say the genocide bombs are good exactly?

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

some pissrahelli bombs were necessary in the past

there

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I know what I wrote, which, incidentally, is not that.

But no, not there. Try again.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Because it’s short-sighted and ridiculous. Yes Russia bombs are bad, yes some NATO bombs are necessary but many are also bad, some Israeli bombs may have been necessary in the past but are now overwhelmingly bad.

https://lem.lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/39233789/19405382

Just making shit up are we?

haha I missed the "overwhelmingly bad" implying that you think some of the bombs today are good blobfox, blobfoxangrylaugh

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes I still know what I wrote thanks. Point is that it’s not in there. You’re just reading what you want. Sorry. Reality doesn’t agree.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I highlighted it for you. There is you talking about "necessary pisrahelli bombs", I don't know what you're hoping for with this "nuh-uh" head in the sand thing, it's funny as fuck though.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Your insistence on pinning something on me is pretty amusing. You keep swinging and missing. Like a fucking piñata party with a kid whose stick is too short. But sure, keep trying short stick!

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah nice meme. But where in this reply chain did I give you the impression that I was hurt or angry in any way? You’re not very good at this, are you? This is getting really embarrassing really fast.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

By the fact that all you have is "no I didnt say some of Israel bombs were necessary" when you very clearly did lol. There isnt even an attempt at arguing, its just "nuh-uuuh" blobcat, laughing

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

See, that only shows you can’t read. See you mentioned I agree with genocidal bombs. I asked you to tell me where. You came up with a sentence where I did not. So I told you to keep looking.

I also told you that I know what I wrote (twice actually) and you responded by “I highlighted it for you”, showing once more that you simply can’t read. So please, double down and even triple down on an idiotic point that you can’t back up for the life of you. And by the entirety of this thread showing that you would be the lowest number in a room temperature IQ contest. On a Celsius scale.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Any bomb by pissrahell is a genocidal bomb lol, their raison d'etre is settlerism. There is no military action they undertook that wasn't either to grab more land or defend what they had already stolen. The fact that you think I didn't understand what you meant shows how self assured you are in your stupidity.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

So there never was a terrorist threat to Israeli citizens?

I am now even more convinced that you don’t understand what I mean. Or just don’t want to because you’ve dug down too much and are unable to see the fact that you may have been wrong in your initial analysis of the comment.

Perhaps you should get off your high horse and think about what someone really means instead of trying to bait them like a fucking MAGAt and crying like a little bitch when that doesn’t work out for you.

No there never was. There was a threat to pissrahelli settlers sure, but I don't consider a threat to terrorists terrorism. I perfectly understood you're commenr from the beginnig. You think the zionist entity has a right to defend it's stolen land.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So there never was a terrorist threat to Israeli citizens?

Mask off moment. Never argue with a liberal, it's a complete waste of time

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Because they won’t agree with your simplistic tankie views?

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Because they always argue in bad faith based on a surface level reading of headlines. It's always the same story. I see a "tankie" citing research, statistics, historical texts on one side, and on the other I see someone like you, floundering. It's embarrassing, and a waste of time, because you're not in this in good faith. You never really engage with the arguments. So what's the point?

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago

Please show me where the tankie cited research, statistics or historical texts.

You’re embarrassing yourself here. And you’re not in good faith either. I am in absolutely the best of faiths and have not made a single bad faith argument in this entire thread. Get off your high horse. You don’t own the truth.