82
submitted 10 months ago by ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 71 points 10 months ago

gender-critical activist

Well, that is taking trivializing transphobia to a whole new level. What's next, calling fascists "democracy-critical activists"?

[-] elfpie@beehaw.org 16 points 10 months ago

There's an argument in favor of using the expression they chose. It taints it. They can say TERF is a slur, but, if the discussion about how horrible and wrong they are uses gender critical, they lose one deflection and anyone interested in the subject will see negative results in their research.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 20 points 10 months ago

TERF is literally the term they chose. They don't get to change it to something else now that people are on to their bullshit.

[-] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 16 points 10 months ago

As a trans-inclusive radical feminist sick of radical feminism being tainted by their bullshit, I strongly disagree. Let them pick a new name showing how far they’ve strayed from the feminist ideal that biology shouldn’t determine destiny.

[-] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 20 points 10 months ago

I hear "TERF," and my attention goes to the bit on "Trans-exclusive". Never gave the "Radical feminism" bit much thought.

And before TERFs became a thing, it was just radical feminism. Having to modify it with "trans exclusive" suggests that inclusivity is actually the default position.

[-] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 7 points 10 months ago

Except how often do you hear about radical feminists who aren’t TERFs anywhere in mainstream discourse? For much of the population, TERFs are the only “radical feminists” they hear about. (I reject the idea that a belief that biology is destiny as compatible with feminism in any case.). It’s not so much people in this community I worry about getting the wrong idea, it’s everywhere else.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 10 months ago

I disagree. TERF is not a slur, nor is cis. If someone chooses to be offended by a term that is not offensive in any way, it's not my fault. 'Gender-critical activist' is nothing but trivialization, and if we start to use it, it gets validated.

load more comments (13 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
82 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6126 readers
20 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS