CyberEgg

In your list, Politico is classified as a reliable source specifically on the topic of american politics. This community is only about american politics when they are affecting Europe directly. And if I understand your definition of a reliable source correctly it is about whether events and relevant topics are mentioned and not about how they are framed, right? So take the facts out of sources but do not automatically accept the framing of the facts from the source, am I correct?

Also, this isn't only about the factuality and bias, it is also about denying Axel Springer the clicks.

In seiner Rede hatte der US-Vize unterstellt, es gebe keine Meinungsfreiheit in Europa. Und dies als größere Bedrohung für die Region als Russland oder China bezeichnet. In einem Interview mit dem »Wall Street Journal« hatte Vance zudem der deutschen Politik geraten, mit allen Parteien zusammenzuarbeiten – also ausdrücklich auch mit der AfD.

Geht es nach Döpfner, dann habe Vance sagen wollen, dass Washington mit Europa zusammenarbeiten wolle – der Kontinent zunächst aber definieren müsse, wofür er stehe, und aufhören müsse, Angst vor seinen eigenen Leuten zu haben.

»Ehrlich gesagt finde ich, dass es eine inspirierende Botschaft ist«, sagte Döpfner der »Financial Times«. »Man muss nicht alles wörtlich nehmen, aber man sollte versuchen, es ernst zu nehmen.« Es sei strategisch unklug und sogar gefährlich, dass »die meisten Europäer nur in einem weinerlichen Tonfall reagiert haben«, sagte Döpfner. Schließlich brauche Europa ein transatlantisches Sicherheitsbündnis und eine transatlantische Handelsbeziehung.

https://www.spiegel.de/politik/j-d-vance-mathias-doepfner-nennt-rede-inspirierend-und-europaeer-weinerlich-a-46ab5fa4-0b56-46c8-aa1a-287ce66b2917

Some news outlets are being removed only when the articles are about certain topics and Xitter is only to be linked through xcancel. But besides archive.org I don't know what would provide access to articles without giving Axel Springer the click. And AFAIK automatic flags like "Treat article with caution due to [factor]" don't exist in Lemmy.

Yes, in the community sidebar.

The source is linked above. That [29].

You just claimed that Döpfner seems to be representing liberal left mainstream opinions. I provided evidence that that is not quite the case.

That is not what I wrote. Don't rip stuff out of context.

So praising a right winger's endorsement of the european far right as inspiring is somehow something the left would do? Do you really think that?

Bro, you need to read up on your basics. Like what "fossiles" mean, what the unions are for and what their positions are, what the german social democrats are nowadays. I can't (I don't want to) teach you up on this.

Döpfner praised US Vice President JD Vance's Munich Security Conference speech, where he called for an end to the political isolation of the European far right. Döpfner called the response by European leaders "whiny."[29]

Yeah, so left wing...

I wouldn't care if it was every now and then, but recently the frequency of Politico articles being shared here has skyrocketed - mostly by a single user, but I have seen them being posted by others, too.

I made a post.

Also, I don't know Ground's evaluation system, but categorising a medium owned by Axel Springer SE and publishing fossile and military lobby articles as left leaning is quite wrong if you ask me.

Fuck Politico, fuck Axel Springer, fuck Döpfner. Don't share their BS, don't give them clicks.