this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
78 points (89.8% liked)

Selfhosted

56953 readers
1056 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last month I posted HelixNotes here and some of you asked about mobile. Version 1.2.1 ships with an Android APK. Same codebase, Rust + Tauri 2.0, no separate app. Since last post: Android support, Ollama for local AI, graph view performance improvements, wiki-link navigation, and a bunch of mobile UX polish. Direct APK download from the site. IzzyOnDroid submission in progress. AGPL-3.0, source on Codeberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s a pretty polished notes app, though couldn’t see that it supports encryption.

[–] ArkHost@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, notes are plain .md files on your disk. Encryption was never the goal.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would like to see encryption, but I have to respect having a clear goal.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it makes sense to handle this at a lower level. After using other notes apps, the thing I want is for it to not have some arbitrary opaque file hierarchy that locks me into it. I want a plain dir of .md files, some resources they link to, and that's it. If I want disk encryption, there are solutions for that. I can use something like LUKs to encrypt my whole drive, or even just the notes directory.

For android, afaik everything uses disk encryption by default.

The unix philosophy is do one thing really well. We don't need a note taking app that also handles encryption.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

In practice this app competes with StandardNotes and Notesnook. People using those might be interested in switching, but they’ll want encryption as a feature of the app.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

I've not heard of those, but to me this is a competitor to the much more ubiquitous Obsidian. Which works great, and has a whole community of support, but is not open source.

Personally, I don't need my notes app not be responsible for syncing across devices either. I already have that for other file types (photos, media, etc).

I'm not against these features being added, but this app is young, afaik it's one person writing it, so I'd rather see their time be spent making the note taking experience as good as it can be.

I also generally wouldn't trust one person to properly audit the security of the networking and encryption features. If I wanted those features, I'd still give the community time to peruse the codebase.

[–] Unusable3151@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Doesn't look like it