Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

4260 readers

191 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

WhoRoger@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

Awa@lemmy.world

110

ChatGPT Health 'under-triaged' half of medical emergencies in a new study (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 14 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/health@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Researchers tested different medical scenarios with the chatbot. In more than half of cases in which doctors would send patients to the ER, the chatbot said it was OK to delay care.

ChatGPT Health

OpenAI's new health-focused chatbot

frequently underestimated the severity of medical emergencies, according to a study published last week in the journal Nature Medicine.

In the study, researchers tested ChatGPT Health's ability to triage, or assess the severity of, medical cases based on real-life scenarios.

Previous research has shown that ChatGPT can pass medical exams, and nearly two-thirds of physicians reported using some form of AI in 2024. But other research has shown that chatbots, including ChatGPT, don't provide reliable medical advice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

Nothing Kairos is saying is misinformation though. Temperature applies randomness to a generated probability distribution for tokens. That doesn't mean the probability distribution wasn't generated deterministically. That doesn't mean the randomness applied couldn't be deterministic. How they describe it working is accurate, they don't need to prove their qualifications and knowledge of jargon for that to be a good argument, and by focusing on that aspect of things in a way that doesn't contradict the point, you are making a bad argument.

What's lost is the question of what determinism even means in this context or why a property of being deterministic would even matter. It is unclear how being deterministic or not deterministic, by any definition, would have anything to do with how good a LLM is at making correct medical decisions, like the person starting this comment chain was implying.