Noticed this in 148.0 for desktop
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
157 points (96.4% liked)
Firefox
7009 readers
275 users here now
A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Broken record chiming in: it should be opt-in, not opt-out.
I chose to opt out of having Firefox installed. Gave me an opportunity to use the very satisfying but rarely used apt purge function.
Waterfox or Librewolf or what you trying now?
Librewolf, but also have Floorp and Vivaldi installed. How's Waterfox going these days? Feel like I haven't looked at that in ages.
I havent used it myself but a buddy of mine is really liking it.
I dig their stance. https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/
Waterfox did better consumer advocacy in a single blog post than the entire multimillion-dollar Mozilla Foundation has pumped out over the past two years.
Oh nice, that good to hear.
Broken record 2 chiming in. None of these features do anything unless you use them so they effectively are opt-in. Turning off the settings gets rid of the UI elements that are how you'd use them, which is excellent.
Additionally, a setting to automatically disable future features is a very strong acknowledgement of and empowerment for strongly anti-AI users.
Up until now I have agreed with the crowd upset at how FF as handled AI features, but at this point you are just upset because you want to be.
I'd like to choose to opt out of Firefox spending donation money on features the community explicitly states that they do NOT want
If Mozilla didn't pester you with notifications about AI tab grouping and AI page summaries, congratulations. It's still sapped limited time and resources away from fixing bugs and implementing features that aren't as controversial.
They've commented on this. The time spent on this did not "take away from time spent on other things". The features were worked on by a few people who wanted to build those features. From a Mozilla employee in a hacker news thread.
So Mozilla did not pay the people that worked on, tested, and approved these features?
I actually couldnt find any public info to back up my comment so maybe a HN comment wasnt enough to go off. But Idk if announcing they partnered with OpenAI to integrate it would even improve things given their current actions.
Can't disagree that I'd rather the time be spent elsewhere, but firefox needs to be a big tent that isn't only targeted to tech savvy or anti AI people. I'll also admit I turned off smart tab group in about:config as soon as I saw it, but rather than "pestering" it was just a button in the tab group UI? I don't even know how to do link previews so it definitely never pestered me there. Local language translation is actively useful and far more desirable that using remote services.
Another point about pulling time away from other development... The same time period these were implemented is also when they finally started doing things people definitely like such as tab groups and vertical tabs so it sure doesn't seem like they're too tight in resources.
Tldr; firefox is for everyone and being mad that they implemented features you don't use is entitled bullshit
Isn't that what add on are for?
The opposite of pro-AI isn't anti-AI. It's non-AI. Mozilla has a community forum to solicit feedback. Nobody used it to ask for AI. Instead, Mozilla repeatedly used it to announce they were going to push AI features on their community.
People aren't converting to Mozilla because it has AI. They were never going to convert to Mozilla because they added a shopping toolbar, either. These are things that should have never been put into the browser. They're certainly alienating their existing users by trying to bleed them dry, though.
You've lost your damn mind
You also don't use an adblocker I guess?
No idea why you'd think that....