this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
17 points (94.7% liked)

Spaceflight

2331 readers
9 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Seems like this might not happen at all, according to Eric Berger: https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/2029254167471006033

The proposed language to cap NASA's launch procurement at 50 percent from any one company has been dropped from the final NASA reauthorization bill.

[โ€“] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Nice, I think that's for the best.

Switching to NSSL style procurement or big picture quotas doesn't seem like it makes sense for NASA. Planetary science doesn't exactly use "reference orbits" like the defense missions, and NASA already diversifies their launchers on ISS crew and cargo. If anything, letting lunar landers and smallsats figure out their own rides and rideshares is more in line with a commercial market solution than what Bridenstine was paid to support.