this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
437 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

46963 readers
498 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Not sure if this is worldwide or only in some countries)

Updating to iOS 26.4DB2 will put your phone into a parental-restricted mode with adult websites blocked on all browsers, warning prompts every time you try to send or receive an explicit image on a messaging app, and all social media apps blocked on the App Store (in Australia)

The settings to disable this mode are locked off until you verify your age either with a credit card, photo ID, or though information Apple already has (like the age of your account).

I've been an apple user my entire adult life but this might finally be the thing that forces me off the platform. Do any other long term apple users have some tips about migrating? I've heard Ashai Linux is pretty good on mac hardware these days and I've been thinking about GrapheneOS for a while.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Sadly graphene will have to implement age verification too at some point as these laws spread like the ones in California that require ALL os providers including Linux to implement it albeit a pointless user dob input at account creation or be fined into the afterlife

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

including Linux

How would they enforce that on an open-source platform?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

By destroying all general-purpose computing available to consumers.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You mean, like...rounding up every computer and burning them?

I really don't know what you mean by this.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean DRMing and Tivoizing every new computer so that it can't be rooted or jailbroken and Linux won't run on it. Requiring a license from the state to have a compiler. You know, The Right to Read or Unauthorized Bread type shit.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well...I dunno. I don't think you're crazy or anything, I'm sure there are some who absolutely do want to do that. But they've been trying to get rid of digital piracy for thirty years and haven't made any headway, so I'm dubious about how well that would work.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Only because, up to this point, we've been successful at pushing back against this tyranny. But make no mistake: that is the real goal of this "age verification" bullshit.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe so, but there's no profit motive for tech companies to aid users with piracy. There is one to continue providing general computing to users. So if we were able to win in the former, the latter should be a cake walk.

[–] illi@piefed.social 8 points 3 days ago

Probably over time. Look at the RAM situation - the fear is this will be the norm. At best.

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right, people can just compile their own, which I will absolutely do if need be

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Already running Linux, so Linux. And they're not going to be able to stop people sharing their compiled images

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

The California law doesn't require age verification, just a setting on the account that e.g. a parent can set. It's still stupid, but it's not what apple is supposedly doing here.

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yep, I’m not sure how come everyone thinks graphene will somehow be exempt.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They're open source and their OEM partner, Lenovo is out of US sphere of influence. They can patch the code when it's put on the phone, just like how manufacturers modify Android source code.

I hope GrapheneOS makes it easy to avoid and still verify integrity.

If they're forced to have them in USA and EU, so be it. That's their policy problem for their people. It's a win for everyone else.

[–] gnuthing@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 days ago

They can just add a disclaimer saying it's not available in CA. Could even block CA IP addresses from downloads