this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
208 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

82412 readers
3153 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] markz@suppo.fi 40 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don't think it should even be comparable between totally different architectures.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago

Yeah, we've been through this exact same game with multiple iterations of Intel and AMD chips. When AMD first started doing consumer CPUs they badged them according to their equivalent Intel clock speed because one to one comparisons were misleading.

What's the L1 and L2 cache? What are the bus speeds? How many cores and how are they architectured? Multi-threading? How many steps is the instruction cycle? There are so many factors beyond just clock speed that play into real world performance.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't believe people still look at Hz and think it's a sole metric that can be used for performance.

Do you think they look at the 2005 Pentium 4's 3.8GHz and assume it's only slightly worse than what Nvidia will put on the market?

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I'd take one of those. My P4 is only 3.0 GHz.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm hopeful ARM will follow more the licensing path than the going full Android path. I think stronger ARM computers, built at the ISA level by any company are also stronger RISCV computers. Builders like Rockchip (China) show that ARM and RISCV computers will bring alternatives to people, possibly with smaller fabs or on demand.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Truly open/libre systems will have to be RISCV. They don't have to be the fastest.