158
Disney’s ‘Robin Hood’ Live-Action Remake Not Moving Forward, Says Director
(www.hollywoodreporter.com)
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
You say these as if they would be bad things.
In most cases, people will still prefer the 'official' sequels and such from the original creator. Because if you liked the original, then you'll want more from the same creator, and maybe not so much from other, unknown creators.
To take one example, Copious fanfic of the Harry Potter books does exist, and it even existed well before the final books were released, much earlier than 10 years. Some of it was (I assume) actually pretty well-written and creative. And unlike the official books, it was available for free. And yet, readers of the franchise, overwhelmingly, preferred to pay to read the official sequels, rather than read free fanfic of it.
Could this result in slightly less profits for content creators of series works? Sure, maybe. But there's also the chance that these off-brand sequels could be good. Perhaps better than official sequels. Perhaps even better than the original. Having more choices and more options out there can only be good for the consumer. And it might even be good for the content creators as well -- it will motivate them to keep quality high during later parts of the series, since they can't depend on IP protection and being able to ride on the coattails of previous success. Since disappointing sequels are pervasive in our media landscape, perhaps that will be a very good thing indeed.
You're already stumbling into that conclusion with:
But the biggest part is just giving consumers more options and more art. Just think of all the great art we might be missing out on, art that would have been made if copyright law didn't prevent it.