this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
59 points (95.4% liked)

Opensource

5722 readers
219 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The newest open-source concern around AI that is seeing a lot of interest this weekend is when large language models / AI code generators may rewrite large parts of a codebase and then the "developers" claiming an alternative license incompatible with the original source license. This became a real concern this week with a popular Python project experiencing an AI-driven code rewrite and now published under an alternative license that its original author does not agree with and incompatible with the original code.

Chardet as a Python character encoding detector with its v7.0 release last week was a "ground-up, MIT-licensed rewrite of chardet." This rewrite was largely driven via AI/LLM and claims to be up to 41x faster and offer an array of new features. But with this AI-driven rewrite, the license shifted from the LGPL to MIT.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI-generated art not being copyrightable doesn't necessarily mean AI-generated art can't violate original copyright, though.

This is not about AI-generated code being relicensed to different AI-generated code. It's about the original licensed code being relicensed or otherwise violated through AI-generated code.

[–] HetareKing@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

You're not wrong, but I don't see how it's relevant to what I'm trying to say. Whether or not they're legally allowed to change the license has nothing to do with why they might want to change the license.