this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
216 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

82516 readers
4467 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
216
Bluesky CEO Jay Graber Is Stepping Down (www.wired.com)
submitted 2 days ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archive: https://archive.ph/MESzb

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Inkstainthebat@pawb.social 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I'd like to hijack the top comment to say that despite news like these, a friend of mine who's been involved with development (interacted with developers, looked at code...) says that recent updates have made the ATProto service stack much more optimized and accessible. There's also quite a few "Atmosphere" services already, such as leaflet.pub

And I'm gonna be honest most implementations of ActivityPub I've seen so far have felt more like a normal social media with a "talk to other servers!" gimmick

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

TIL my comment is the top comment.

But the ATProto architecture is still too fundamentally centralized, and thus easily censorable.

Quoting myself from nearly a year ago:

Bluesky is ... arguably 'federated', but it is centralized, not decentralized.

https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20241128-bluesky-decentralization

Their model (AT Protocol) relies on a central, authoritative ... 'Relay', that all 'federated' users and posts on federated PDS (personal data servers) must go through, to actually reach the 'AppView', ie, what all other people/users can actually see.

So, this is not a many to many, tangled spider web of connections, the way lemmy, and other parts of the actual fediverse are.

It is a top down hierarchy, a pyramid.

And Bluesky runs the Relay, the chokepoint.

If Bluesky cuts off the PDS your account is on, everyone on it is now gone.

The actual fediverse, Mastadon, Lemmy, etc, runs on ActivityPub.

In that model... every instance is essentially self contained, and every instance that is federated communicates with every other instance that is federated.

Each instance can decide what other instances they want to federate with... and users on each instance can personally block even more other users, communities, or entire instances if they choose to, but that only effects what that particular user sees.

That is what you call decentralized, approaching, or also having elements of being 'distributed'.

Now, of course, thats a bit simplified, the AppView is actually more complex than that, the 'Relay' is in actuality a bunch of different machines in different physical locations...

... but it still acts as a monolithic layer, a gate keeper, controlled by a board of directors.

Is anybody else running their own Relay yet?

Thats a genuine question, I totally wrote off BlueSky long ago.

If not, this is all still fundamentally the same.

If you just see ActivityPub as 'normal social media that can talk to other servers'... you don't get it.

  1. There's no single centralized chokepoint that is under corporate control.

  2. Costs of running your own ActPub instance are generally not exhorbitantly expensive, thus the entire paradigm is more 'small d' democratic, has a lower barrier to entry and is thus more practically distributable.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 9 hours ago

At some point, hopefully, the users will shape the social media platforms instead of the other way around.